Dear Mr. Spielberg,

Please, Steve?

It’s time to take back the Jewish film.

With the announcement that Mel Gibson aims to helm a Judah Maccabee picture and the immediate hell-no-we-won’t-go-response of the Anti Defamation League and the disdain from other Jews and Jewish groups, one can only hope that actual Jew Stephen Spielberg’s imaginative wheels are churning on his next undertaking, even if only to thwart Hollywood’s leading anti-Semite.

Warner Brothers should be ashamed of themselves for giving Gibson a soapbox to stand on, even if he pinky-promises a lovely tale of Jewish triumph (he hasn’t, he won’t). Surely the entertainment world would quickly reconsider if the situation were say, Chris Brown making an Ike & Tina biopic. Fans of cinema don’t need Braveheart retelling and cheapening the story of a central Jewish figure like he did with his Christ picture. Oh, and need we remind the studio heads at Warner Brothers that the family behind the “Warner” name was Jack, Harry, Albert and Sam Warner, sons of Jewish immigrants from Poland. And that WB CEO Barry Meyer is also one of the Chosen People — much like most of high powered Hollywood, but who’s counting?

Who is Mr. Gibson that he can just select such an extraordinary figure in Judaic biblical lore? Yes, he has money and connections, but who are we to allow him the option? Nevermind that he will have the creative say in how he chooses to depict the story, the kind of freedom that any director has in portraying his vision, what to highlight and omit, as well as the very basics of filmmaking such as who to cast and where to film. Nevermind that he will also be granted Freedom of the Microphone as he makes his promotional rounds, toting about his beliefs like Moses and his staff, without any nod to sensitivity or humility behind his past indiscretions. And nevermind that he will earn money with the version of the story he chooses to portray as he attempts to claw his way back to the movie star respect he once had – you know, before his anti-Jew tirades, Holocaust denial, alleged physical abuse, anti-gay spewings, and overall there’s-a-lot-to-dislike-about-this-man (and his father!) public meltdowns. Gibson doesn’t have an ounce of tact in him, nor thoughtfulness or delicacy that would advise him to just stay away from this project or any other twisted association to films about Jewry.

Instead, Spielberg take a stab at it. Your films could use a revolutionary makeover. Not that we’re not looking forward to Tintin orLincoln, or we didn’t appreciate your producing endeavors like Super 8 and Transformers (I advocate for casting true-Jews Shia Labeouf in any picture), but we’re missing the smarts and conviction of your films prior. The magic behind a Dreamworks picture that doesn’t revolve around a robot or an explosion scene. Remember all the harsh criticism following 2006’s Munich? The movie was marred a political protest againstyour own tribe; the Jews were angry, the Arabs were angry, and the Americans largely ignored the project. A new Israeli-Jewish hero movie could not only redeem that blunder, but it would do exactly what cinematic audiences would like to do to the now well-intended (he’s not) Mr. Gibson: stick it to him.

How about a rousing picture of biblical Samson? Or King David? More modern luminaries color Israeli history, from prime minsters to the distinguished story of Yoni Netanyahu of Operation Entebbe (Kevin Macdonald’s The Last King of Scotland ends with the beginning of the 1976 Entebbe hostage crises, practically setting the table for a new film to retell that saga!), all just begging for a Hollywood touch. Show Gibson and Co. exactly what a hero tale is, what timeless and legendary really mean in the giant spectrum of cinematic remakes and technological breakthroughs, a place where original, heart-rendering tales tend to get lost in the shuffle. Recall the emotion of Schindler’s List and Saving Private Ryan. The innocent tenderness of E.T.The wit and wisdom of Catch Me If You Can. Even The Terminal had us leaving the theaters with some semblance of hope, a smirk on our faces, and a huge feeling of pride for our Jewish Director King. Moreover, a Spielberg film would be nothing were it not for the circumstances surrounding it and the message it should tell.

So here’s your message, Mr. Spielberg: Mel Gibson is doing it wrong. Another way for him to taint stories with hatred and publicize the entire ordeal. This is a man who just starred in a movie about a beaver puppet. Take the matter in your own hands in the way only you can. We’ll be waiting with breath baited and popcorn buckets aplenty. Make a picture, make us proud, and really show ol’ Mel who’s boss, not only in cinema and Hollywood, but in the kindness and dignity of the human landscape.

Next year a picture about Jerusalem?

We eagerly await!

Your we’re-not-seeing-a-Gibson-picture fans


Latest posts by Sasha (see all)

About the author


Writer, blogger, producer. Television and showbiz junkie, news and Israel aficionado. Fluent in snark and spunk, always on the go and properly accessorized.


  • You don’t need a Spielberg to take on Mad Mel, Eli Roth would suffice.

  • Both Stephen Spielberg and Mel Gibson need a reminder that it’s been the Jews who have given them the ability to produce such films! Without the rich history of the Jewish people, indeed the chosen people, there would be no such stories to convey to the world. I agree with your statement, “It’s time to take back the Jewish film.” The world needs to know the truth though and I doubt it will come through movies such as this one. In my opinion it’s almost a mockery. Yes! take back what was stolen from you!

  • Sadly, Mel Gibson is more than a walking punchline. He is still commands influence. Whether or not the Jewish community buys tickets to his films is irrelevant. Better to consider how his views and interpretation of Jewish history has on the non Jewish movie going audience.