Hey guys! Muffti has been away for a while giving lectures on such stimulating topics as the semantics of conditionals (and bi-conditionals) as well as even more esoteric topics to surprisingly receptive UK audiences. So he’s away but hopefully not forgotten.

That said, the ever-irreverent EV has drafted a new comic that Muffti suggest you all read. If you don’t, you will have to pay by listening to the gory details of how he and man-whore Jonathan extended the triviality proofs concerning conditionals to biconditionals and what it reveals for expressivist semantics…

grandmuffti
Latest posts by grandmuffti (see all)

About the author

grandmuffti

44 Comments

  • Muffti never let you edit his papers ever. You took that job on yourself, douche 🙂

    Muffti knows you are curious Froylein. you don’t have to ask.

  • And I only just likened Rabbi Kelsey to my pendant!

    Oh, and I would ask Muffti, but he might claim I’m curious. 🙂

  • How come Muffti never lets me edit his papers anymore? Ask him… it’s pretty funny.

    But getting back on topic… is it just me or does EV’s ghetto Jew look like a drug inspired and demented version of David Kelsey minus the gold lamé…

  • Glad you agree Morrissey! Thanks Froylein, glad yo liked it. The peop;le at Nottingham and Leeds seemed to like it as well.

  • Tom, while Muffti may have shown off a bit above, the paper he let me read was pretty interesting, at least to me.

  • p(A ↔ B|B) = p((A -> B) & (B -> A)|B)
    = p(B | A|B)
    = p(A|B).
    Similarly, (5) and (6) also yield
    p(A ↔ B|¬B) = p((A ! B) & (B | A)|¬B)
    = 0.
    Applying the theorem of total probability to A ↔ B, we then have
    p(A ↔ B) = p(A ↔ B|B)p(B) + p(A ↔ B|¬B)p(¬B)
    = p(A|B)p(B) + 0 · p(¬B)
    = p(A & B).

  • Her lowcut-evening dress pic gained quite some attention in the tabloids.

    The very morning before I’d told one of my students, “There are two things I’d never want to know: firstly, what our chancelorette looks like in the nude. Secondly, what’s going on inside your head.”

    Where’s Muffti with the biconditionals? I’d like to read more about it.

  • You can only vote CSU in Bavaria. I don’t think Rosa was hot considering she was way dead when I first heard about her. 🙂

  • Rosa was pretty hot, wasn’t she?… Vote CSU, froylein. A BMW in every garage.

  • Tom, how come you always come up with such unflattering comparisons? I don’t see myself ever voting for either of the Socialist parties over here; particularly the SPD has shown, IMHO, an inclination to producing dumb workforce by “opening up”, thus downrating, the educational system, which translates as titles and degrees not being worth anymore what they used to be worth and by gradually encouraging teaching and examination techniques as well as subjects that don’t support critical thinking.

  • Yeah, but you’re German. A Rosa Luxemburg type.

    I’m thinking of this site’s would-be machers who turn into done-up little machettes behind closed doors.

  • There’s enough of that going on on this site as it is. And yes, they know who they are.

  • Folks might mistake me for dj handler or MC Hammer or somebody.

  • Even if I wear a female stocking over my head, it doesn’t matter. People can tell.

  • Tell me about it. I can’t get to the local convenience store for a milk run without being accosted by people.

  • Coffee, bj, anything to get the ol’ circulation going…

  • Don’t do it, Froylein, you never know when the naked person standing above you is a Diaspora Jew. OH wait…

  • I was just going to suggest the two of you guys want to negotiate past that already, don’t let me stop you.

  • That doesn’t mean I’ll give him a bj.

    The tallest guy that has ever hit on me was a basketball player of 6’11”.

  • Obviously, neither has EV. 😉

    Or Tom, for that matter – he’s just flirtin’ with you again.

    I think some Israeli person was being supercilious toward EV recently.