As the world mourned for those in a Jerusalem synagogue who were butchered and murdered without mercy, UCLA’s undergraduate elected student government voted 8-2-2 to pass a resolution that calls for the University of California to divest from any U.S. public company that is involved in the West Bank or Gaza.

As you may recall, last February, the meeting of the Undergraduate Students Association Council lasted about 12 hours and included 9 hours of debates on the issue from several sides. Tuesday night’s meeting lasted four hours and included about 90 minutes of comments only from students that supported the divestment resolution. Some speakers mentioned their dislike of drone attacks, gender rules of UCLA bathrooms, and the evil side of capitalism in their public comments on the resolution. The roomful of supporters snapped their approval. Pro-Israel students purposely boycotted the meeting as a way to delegitimize UCLA’s BDS movement.

Negeen Sadeghi-Movahed said that voting for the resolution was the morally right thing to do. Negeen represents transfer students. She is a leader with the Iranian-American Women Foundation and
the United Nations Association’s youth advocacy program in Southern California.

uclavoteDuring the public comments, one student stated that nine members of her family were killed in Gaza this summer. She said that passing the resolution would help her to not have to worry about her remaining family members.

Avinoam Baral, an Israeli-born UCLA student and the current President of the Council was sorry and frustrated that as USAC president he was not able to comment or vote on the resolution. He recently was elevated to President from the position of vp, when then former President resigned

Financial Supports Commissioner Heather Rosen voted against the resultion, as did Allyson Bach, the Academic Affairs Commissioner. Rosen said she thought that the BDS resolution unfairly targets Israel. Greg Kalfayan, the Campus Events Commissioner, and Community Service Commissioner Cynthia Wong abstained from voting on the resolution.

Representatives from Hillel at UCLA, J Street U, and Bruins for Israel made a special 15 minute presentation in which they explained their opposition to the polarizing student resolution. They felt that the resolution misrepresented the views of the majority of the student body. Bruins for Israel, led by Eytan Davidovits, said that more than 2,000 undergrads had signed a petition opposing the resolution.

A separate special USAC presentation was made by Students for Justice in Palestine. They supported the resolution. One member, Ayesha Khan, stated that, “No UCLA student should be forced to funnel their tuition to the killing of their own family.”

As the USAC met, UCLA’s Alpha Epsilon Pi (A E Pi) fraternity hosted several pro-Israel and Jewish students in an alternate meeting. It was publicized as a safe environment for positive discussions. The frat event began with a memorial that honored the lives of all those killed in Israel and Gaza over the summer. Their talking point was that they sought to “reinvest” positively in the campus community and not divest or have a student government focus on complex global issues.

In other California news, Ami Horowitz – a filmmaker and affiliate to Fox News – traveled to UC-Berkeley and made a video attempting to show that a person who supports ISIS would be ignored, but a supporter of Israel would be cursed.

About the author


1 Comment

  • As a Jew born in the U.S., I find the increasing anti-Israel and anti-Jewish sentiment on U.S. college campuses deeply disturbing.

    I am presently going back to school at the Junior College level, but thus far all the classes I have taken are online, so I have not experienced any hostility towards myself. However, there is always the possibility that I may have to take a class required for the degree I am pursuing the old-fashioned way (in person)if the class in question is not available online.

    As an American Jew, I have encountered antisemitism before (most U.S. Jews do at least once in their lives), but I really have no desire to be subjected to it when I am trying to study and better myself in an academic environment.